Login

11 Microsoft Viva Alternatives: Best Replacements for Goals, Glint, and Pulse

November 11, 2026
Jose Kantolaby Jose Kantola

Key Takeaways

  • Viva Goals was retired in December 2025. Teams that relied on it need a separate tool for setting and tracking OKRs.
  • Teamspective is the best option for leadership enablement. It combines engagement, performance, and collaboration insights with company-specific guidance to help managers prepare conversations and follow through.
  • The right alternative depends on what you’re replacing. Culture Amp and Qualtrics support employee listening, Perdoo and Peoplebox focus on goals and OKRs, and Workleap Officevibe and SurveyMonkey offer options for shorter team surveys.

Disclosure and Methodology: This guide is published by Teamspective. We've included our platform alongside competitors and assessed each against the requirements of the Viva product being replaced. Descriptions are based on publicly available Microsoft and vendor documentation and pricing checked on October 26, 2026. Any user-review example is identified and linked individually.

If you’re looking for a Microsoft Viva alternative, it may be because your team has outgrown part of the suite, a product you depended on is no longer available, or you’re rethinking your Microsoft tools altogether.

Most of the people I’ve talked to share one or more of these concerns.

For instance, when Microsoft retired Viva Goals in December 2025, teams that relied on it had to find another way to manage objectives and key results. For some, that change also raised a bigger question: does the rest of the Viva suite still fit their needs?

Other users have found parts of the suite difficult to navigate. One Viva Glint reviewer on G2 praised its dashboards and survey templates but said moving between dashboard views felt complicated as a first-time user.

Most teams already have enough work to do after collecting employee feedback. In a Quantum Workplace study, 65% of employees said their organizations didn’t take effective action on survey results.

If you’re looking for a Microsoft Viva alternative that makes it easier to manage goals, understand employee concerns, and act on what you learn, you’re in the right place.

In this article, I compare 11 Microsoft Viva alternatives for employee listening, team surveys, and goal management, including what each tool does best, its pricing, and its notable limitations.

Summary: Best Microsoft Viva Alternatives by their use case

For Viva Glint

Teamspective, Culture Amp, Qualtrics Employee Experience, and Quantum Workplace offer different approaches to employee listening and acting on results.

For Viva Goals

Perdoo, Peoplebox, Lattice, and Leapsome support goal setting, alignment, and progress tracking.

For Viva Pulse

Workleap Officevibe, TINYpulse, and SurveyMonkey offer ways to collect regular feedback from teams.

Detailed Review of Viva Glint Alternatives for Employee Engagement and Listening

When choosing a Viva Glint alternative, consider how each platform handles survey design, employee feedback, reporting, confidentiality, and follow-up actions. Some tools prioritize research-based engagement insights and benchmarking. Others connect employee feedback with leadership development, performance management, or broader workforce analytics.

The following four platforms offer different approaches to employee listening and engagement.

PlatformBest ForPricingNotable limitations
TeamspectiveCompanies focused on improving leadership and performance enablement.Starting at EUR 5.50 per seat/month; Enterprise: custom quote.Doesn’t include a standalone module for goal setting and OKR management.
Culture AmpData-driven teams that want research-based insights and benchmarking.Custom annual quote based on employee count, products, and service tier.Pricing requires a sales conversation.
Qualtrics Employee ExperienceEnterprises needing advanced survey logic and analyticsCustom quote based on requirements and planned usage.Administrators need to configure dashboard access and action-planning permissions to match organizational requirements.
Quantum WorkplaceMid-market companies looking for employee engagement and performance toolsCustom quote; minimum annual contract of $15,000.Pricing may represent a significant commitment for organizations that only need basic employee surveys.

Below, we'll examine what each platform offers, how it compares with Viva Glint, and the tradeoffs to consider before choosing it.

1. Teamspective

Best for: Organizations that want every manager, not only HR, acting on engagement, performance, and collaboration data inside Slack and Microsoft Teams.

Teamspective leadership enablement platform overview

Viva Glint helps organizations understand employee engagement through surveys and reporting. Teamspective is a leadership enablement platform that combines employee engagement, performance, and collaboration.

Every manager gets Lea, Teamspective’s Leadership Enablement Agent. Lea uses team data alongside your company’s strategy, values, and leadership principles to help managers prepare conversations, coach feedback, and follow through.

For example, if survey results show that employees feel unsupported, Lea can help a manager prepare questions about the support the team needs and identify commitments to discuss. If accountability is one of your leadership principles, those questions and commitments can reflect that expectation.

Lea using team data and the company’s leadership principles to prepare a 1:1
Image source: Lea using team data and the company’s leadership principles to prepare a 1:1.

Here’s how Teamspective brings that context together:

  • Engagement surveys help you understand how employees feel about their work and team.

  • Performance reviews and feedback give managers input on individual performance, competencies, and development.

  • Collaboration insights add context about how people work together. Organizational network analysis can help you investigate cross-team dependencies alongside survey results.

Employees can answer surveys in Slack or Microsoft Teams, while managers can use Lea in those tools to prepare conversations and organize follow-up.

Teamspective also connects with more than 60 HR systems through Kombo, helping keep employee profiles and team structures current without HR maintaining them in two places.

Pricing

  • Standard: Starting at EUR 5.50 per seat/month, up to 300 seats. Price scales with the modules you select.

  • Enterprise: Custom quote for 300+ seats.

  • Free trial: 14 days for up to 20 seats, all core modules, no credit card required.

Main limitation: Teamspective doesn’t include a dedicated goals or OKR management module. Organizations replacing Viva Goals will need a separate tool.

2. Culture Amp

Best for: Data-driven teams that want research-based engagement insights and benchmarking.

Organizations replacing Viva Glint often need more than engagement scores. They need to understand which employee groups are struggling, what may be driving the results, and where managers should focus their efforts. Culture Amp addresses this with research-based surveys, industry benchmarks, comment analysis, and action-planning tools.

Culture Amp engagement heatmap
Image source: Culture Amp engagement heatmap

For example, if company-wide engagement looks healthy but employees in one department report low confidence in leadership, HR can compare that team's results with company-wide scores and external benchmarks. Culture Amp's AI Coach can help managers identify key themes and develop action plans based on the feedback.

Key capabilities

  • Research-based employee engagement surveys and industry benchmarks.

  • Survey comment summaries and sentiment analysis.

  • Demographic and department-level reporting.

  • Manager coaching and action planning.

Pricing

Custom annual pricing based on employee count, selected products, and service tier. Contact Culture Amp for a quote.

Tradeoff: Reporting flexibility may be a limitation for teams that need highly customized analysis. In a July 24, 2026, G2 review, senior talent acquisition consultant Eric M. noted that deeper analysis sometimes requires exporting data and working outside the platform.

G2 review of Culture Amp noting that deeper analysis sometimes requires exporting data

3. Qualtrics Employee Experience

Best for: Enterprises needing advanced survey logic and analytics.

Organizations replacing Viva Glint may need more control over how employee surveys work and how results are analyzed across a large workforce. Qualtrics Employee Experience supports customizable surveys, advanced analytics, dashboards, and continuous employee listening.

Qualtrics employee experience dashboard
Image source: Qualtrics employee experience dashboard

For example, a multinational company investigating declining engagement among regional managers could use branching survey questions to explore different issues across locations, then analyze responses through dashboards. Its action recommendations can help managers identify where to focus rather than leaving HR with a report and no clear next step.

Key capabilities

  • Custom surveys with branching logic.

  • AI-powered analysis of employee feedback and comments.

  • Dashboards for tracking engagement and workforce trends.

  • Employee listening and lifecycle feedback.

Pricing

Custom quote based on the products, usage, and organizational requirements. Contact Qualtrics for current pricing.

Tradeoff: Qualtrics offers extensive customization, but administrators need to configure dashboard access and action-planning permissions carefully. Organizations should test the setup against their reporting and confidentiality requirements before committing.

4. Quantum Workplace

Best for: Mid-market companies that want employee engagement tools with structured follow-through.

Collecting employee feedback is only useful if managers can act on it. For organizations replacing Viva Glint, Quantum Workplace combines engagement surveys and reporting with tools that help managers turn results into action plans.

Quantum Workplace survey focus areas
Image source: Quantum Workplace survey focus areas

For example, if a quarterly survey reveals that employees feel their contributions go unrecognized, HR can help managers identify recognition as a focus area, discuss the results with their teams, and create action items. Quantum Workplace's Action Assistant suggests relevant actions, while its reporting and benchmarks help organizations understand their results in context.

Key capabilities

  • Annual engagement and pulse surveys.

  • Benchmarking against other organizations.

  • Comment analysis and engagement reporting.

  • Action planning with AI-assisted recommendations.

  • Performance and recognition tools.

Pricing

Custom quote based on employee count and selected products. The minimum annual contract is $15,000, according to Quantum Workplace's official pricing page.

Tradeoff: The $15,000 minimum may be difficult to justify for organizations that only need basic employee surveys. Pricing also varies with the selected products and service package.

Replacing Viva Glint?

See how Teamspective helps every manager act on engagement, performance, and collaboration data in Slack and Microsoft Teams.

Get a demo

Best Viva Goals Alternatives for Goals and OKR Tracking

Microsoft Viva Goals helped organizations connect company priorities with team and individual objectives using the objectives and key results (OKR) methodology. Microsoft retired Viva Goals on December 31, 2025, and confirmed it would not replace the product with another Microsoft solution.

Organizations replacing Viva Goals need a way to preserve that connection between strategy and execution. Look for software that supports measurable key results, clear goal ownership, progress updates, and integrations that reduce manual reporting.

Data migration is another consideration. Microsoft previously supported exports through its API, Excel, and PowerPoint. Since Viva Goals is no longer accessible, organizations will generally need previously saved exports or other retained records to rebuild their goals in another platform.

Comparing the Best Viva Goals Alternatives

PlatformBest forPricingNotable limitations
PerdooDedicated strategy, OKR, and KPI managementFree for up to five users; Premium €6.40/user/month; Supreme €8/user/monthAdvanced views, private goals, and viewer licensing vary by plan.
PeopleboxCompanies connecting OKRs with performance management$8/employee/month for Performance Management, billed annuallyAdvanced engagement and development capabilities require additional modules.
LatticeCompanies connecting goals with performance$8/seat/month for Goals & OKRs, billed annually; $4,000 minimum annual agreementEngagement and additional performance capabilities require separate products.
LeapsomeTeams connecting goals with employee developmentGoals & OKRs €4/employee/month, plus the platform foundationTotal cost depends on the foundation and selected modules; promotional pricing may apply.

Pricing is based on published vendor information checked on October 26, 2026. Confirm current rates, billing terms, and package requirements directly with each vendor before purchasing.

Below, we examine how each platform handles goal alignment, measurable results, progress tracking, and the transition from Viva Goals.

1. Perdoo

Best for: Organizations that need dedicated OKR and KPI management.

Perdoo is a good fit for organizations that want to replace Viva Goals with a platform built around strategy execution. It connects company strategy to measurable objectives and key results (OKRs), helping teams understand how their work contributes to broader business priorities.

Perdoo OKR alignment view
Image source: Perdoo OKR alignment view

For example, a company entering a new market can set a company-level objective, define measurable key results, and align team goals with the same strategy. Progress check-ins and dashboards help leaders see whether execution is on track without relying entirely on manual status reports.

Perdoo also supports KPI tracking, strategy maps, and integrations with tools such as Slack and Microsoft Teams. Its strategy map is particularly useful for showing how objectives connect across the organization.

Pricing

Perdoo offers a free plan for up to five users. Premium starts at €6.40 per user per month, while Supreme starts at €8 per user per month. Pricing varies by plan, seat count, and billing terms.

Tradeoff: Perdoo focuses on strategy, OKRs, and KPIs. Organizations looking for a broader employee performance or engagement platform may need additional tools.

2. Peoplebox

Best for: Companies managing OKRs alongside performance reviews and business reviews.

Peoplebox suits organizations that want to connect goal tracking with performance reviews, business reviews, and ongoing employee management. Rather than treating goals as a separate reporting exercise, it helps teams bring objectives and progress updates into their regular management workflows.

Peoplebox company goals view
Image source: Peoplebox company goals view

Consider a company trying to improve customer retention. Leaders can define a company-level target, align team goals with it, and review progress alongside project updates and performance discussions. This gives managers a clearer view of how individual and team contributions support the wider business objective.

Peoplebox supports aligned and cascading goals, progress tracking, business reviews, and integrations with Slack and Microsoft Teams. These integrations can help teams share goal updates without requiring employees to switch constantly between tools.

Pricing

The Performance Management plan costs $8 per employee per month when billed annually and includes OKRs and goals. Additional modules, such as employee engagement and development, can increase the total cost.

Tradeoff: Peoplebox may suit companies seeking an integrated performance management workflow better than those looking only for a lightweight OKR tracker.

3. Lattice

Best for: Companies connecting goals and performance management.

Lattice is worth considering if your organization wants to connect goal management with performance reviews and manager workflows. It helps companies set aligned goals, monitor progress, and give employees a clearer view of how their work contributes to business priorities.

Lattice Goals & OKRs view
Image source: Lattice Goals & OKRs view

For example, a product team trying to improve delivery speed can establish a measurable objective, align team and individual goals with it, and use regular progress updates to identify delays. Managers can then discuss progress and obstacles as part of their broader performance conversations.

Lattice supports cascading goals, progress updates, reminders, and integrations with tools such as Salesforce and Jira. These capabilities help teams keep goals visible and connect planning with the systems where work gets done.

Pricing

Lattice Goals & OKRs costs $8 per seat per month with an annual contract and a $4,000 minimum annual agreement. Other Lattice products are priced separately, so check the package carefully if you also need engagement surveys or broader performance management capabilities.

Tradeoff: Lattice may be more than you need if your main requirement is standalone OKR tracking. Its value depends on whether your organization will use the additional performance and manager workflows.

4. Leapsome

Best for: Teams connecting goal tracking with employee development.

Leapsome is a suitable option for organizations that want goal management to support both business performance and employee development. It connects company, team, and individual goals, helping employees understand their priorities while giving managers a way to track progress and discuss development needs.

Leapsome goals and progress view
Image source: Leapsome goals and progress view

Imagine a customer support organization aiming to improve satisfaction scores. The company can establish a measurable target, align team and individual goals with that target, and monitor progress over time. Managers can use those discussions to identify skill gaps and connect performance expectations with employee development.

Leapsome supports OKRs, goal alignment, progress tracking, and analytics. Its broader employee development capabilities can also help organizations connect goal discussions with feedback and growth plans.

Pricing

Goals & OKRs starts at €4 per employee per month, but a platform foundation is also required. The total cost depends on the foundation and any additional modules selected. Check the vendor's current pricing page for applicable promotions and standard rates.

Tradeoff: Leapsome's pricing structure can make the total cost less straightforward than the goals module's starting price suggests.

Best Viva Pulse Alternatives for Quick Team Feedback

Microsoft Viva Pulse lets managers gather feedback from their teams through short surveys, review the results, and identify areas that need attention. It's designed for frequent, team-level feedback rather than the organization-wide engagement programs associated with Viva Glint.

When evaluating alternatives, consider how easily managers can create surveys, how employees can share honest feedback, and what happens after the results come in. Some platforms provide deeper team-health insights, while others prioritize simple surveys and anonymous feedback.

PlatformBest forPricingNotable limitations
Workleap OfficevibeTeams that want ongoing employee feedback and team-health insightsStandard plan starts at $4,999/year plus $32 per manager per month.Confirm whether employees can complete surveys within Microsoft Teams or must open them separately.
TINYpulseOrganizations that want simple, frequent employee feedbackCustom quote; no current public rate identified.Confirm anonymity safeguards, manager permissions, and Microsoft Teams capabilities during the demo.
SurveyMonkeyTeams that need flexible, low-cost survey collectionFree Basic plan; Team Advantage starts at $30 per creator per month, billed annually, with a three-seat minimum.It's a general survey platform, so employee confidentiality, governance, and follow-up processes may require additional planning.

1. Workleap Officevibe

Best for: Teams that want ongoing feedback and actionable team-health insights.

Viva Pulse gives managers a way to check in with their teams. Workleap Officevibe builds on that idea with recurring pulse surveys, anonymous feedback, and reporting that helps managers track team sentiment over time.

Workleap Officevibe team pulse report
Image source: Workleap Officevibe team pulse report

For example, a manager who notices declining morale can review recent survey results, identify recurring concerns, and use Officevibe's anonymous feedback conversations to better understand the problem. Instead of relying on a single survey, they can monitor whether the team's sentiment changes after taking action.

Key capabilities

  • Recurring pulse surveys and anonymous feedback.

  • Team-health reporting and engagement trends.

  • Anonymous two-way conversations.

  • Manager tools for one-on-ones and employee feedback.

  • Microsoft Teams notifications.

Pricing

The Standard plan starts at $4,999 per year, plus $32 per manager per month. Organizations with more than 250 employees need a custom quote.

Tradeoff: Officevibe's reporting can help managers identify team-level trends, but buyers should verify the exact Microsoft Teams workflow. Notifications don't necessarily mean employees can complete surveys entirely within Teams.

2. TINYpulse by WebMD Health Services

Best for: Organizations that want simple, frequent employee feedback.

Some teams don't need a comprehensive employee experience platform. They need an easy way to ask employees how things are going, surface concerns they might hesitate to raise publicly, and respond before small problems become larger ones.

TINYpulse focuses on this type of ongoing listening through short surveys, anonymous feedback, and employee suggestions.

TINYpulse survey reporting
Image source: TINYpulse survey reporting

For example, an HR manager could send a brief survey after a major organizational change to understand how employees are adjusting. Anonymous feedback and suggestion tools can help surface concerns that might not come up during regular team meetings.

Key capabilities

  • Short, recurring employee surveys.

  • Anonymous feedback and two-way conversations.

  • Employee suggestions and a suggestion box.

  • Recognition tools.

  • Reporting on feedback trends.

Pricing

Custom quote. No current public pricing rate was identified, so request a quote for your employee count and required features.

Tradeoff: The final cost and available functionality depend on the package. Before choosing TINYpulse, confirm survey scheduling, manager access to results, anonymity safeguards, and whether the Microsoft Teams workflow supports the experience your employees need.

3. SurveyMonkey

Best for: Teams that need flexible, low-cost feedback collection.

Viva Pulse provides a manager-focused approach to team feedback. SurveyMonkey takes a broader approach: it gives teams a general-purpose survey builder they can use to collect employee feedback, measure satisfaction, and run targeted check-ins.

SurveyMonkey survey card in Microsoft Teams
Image source: SurveyMonkey survey card in Teams

For example, an HR team could create a short survey after an internal training session or organizational change, then review responses to identify areas for improvement. Templates and reporting tools make it practical to run these surveys without adopting a dedicated employee engagement platform.

Key capabilities

  • Survey builder with customizable questions.

  • Templates for employee feedback and satisfaction surveys.

  • Response collection and reporting.

  • Microsoft Teams integration for supported survey workflows.

  • Free and paid plans for different requirements.

Pricing

SurveyMonkey offers a free Basic plan. Team Advantage starts at $30 per creator per month with annual billing and a three-seat minimum. Check the current plan limits for response volumes and available features before purchasing.

Tradeoff: SurveyMonkey is a general survey tool rather than a dedicated employee listening platform. Teams may need to establish their own processes for protecting confidential feedback, sharing results with managers, and tracking follow-up actions.

How to Choose a Microsoft Viva Alternative

The right replacement depends on which Viva product you're replacing, the workflows your team needs to preserve, and how you plan to use the results.

Use these four checks to narrow your options.

Replacing Viva Glint? Evaluate surveys, reporting, and follow-through

If you used Glint to measure organization-wide engagement, compare how each platform handles survey design, reporting, confidentiality, comment analysis, and manager action planning.

For example, if engagement scores drop in one department, can HR investigate the underlying feedback, compare results across teams, and help managers decide what to address? Test this workflow with a realistic survey rather than relying on a product demo.

Also consider what happens after HR identifies an issue. Does the platform help managers understand team dynamics and decide what to do next? Teamspective takes this approach by combining employee engagement, performance, and collaboration data. Lea helps leaders interpret team insights and prepare for meaningful conversations.

Replacing Viva Goals? Test goal alignment and progress tracking

Viva Goals users need a way to connect company priorities with team objectives and measurable key results. Compare goal hierarchies, ownership, progress updates, integrations, and available import options.

For example, if your company aims to improve customer retention, can you connect that objective to team-level key results, assign owners, and track progress without manually combining updates from different systems?

Check how the platform handles existing goal data before migrating. Review your Viva Goals exports and confirm which information the replacement can import. Don't assume a vendor can recover data that wasn't saved before Microsoft's retirement deadline.

Replacing Viva Pulse? Check the complete manager feedback workflow

If you use Pulse for quick, manager-led team surveys, compare how easily managers can create surveys, collect confidential feedback, review results, and agree on follow-up actions.

For example, a manager who wants to understand why a team is struggling with workload should be able to send a short survey, review the results, discuss the findings, and check whether the situation improves over time.

Also test how the platform fits into your existing workflow. If Microsoft Teams is central to daily work, confirm where surveys are created, how employees respond, where results appear, and whether managers can follow up without switching applications.

Compare the total cost, not just the starting price

A replacement's advertised price may not reflect the full cost of using it across your organization. Compare employee seats, manager and survey-creator licenses, additional modules, integrations, implementation services, and security requirements.

Check whether essential reporting or administration capabilities require a higher pricing tier. A lower starting price may not offer much value if HR needs extra tools to analyze results or spends more time consolidating data.

Also consider the cost of poor follow-through. A platform that collects feedback but leaves managers without clear next steps may solve only part of the problem. Evaluate how each option helps your organization turn employee insights into visible action.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Microsoft retire all of Viva?

No. Microsoft retired Viva Goals on December 31, 2025, but Viva Glint and Viva Pulse serve different employee-listening needs. Glint focuses on organization-wide employee engagement, while Pulse helps managers collect feedback from their teams.

What replaces Viva Goals for OKR tracking?

The best alternative depends on how your organization manages objectives and measures progress.

  • Perdoo: Dedicated OKR and KPI tracking.

  • Peoplebox: OKR execution alongside performance management.

  • Lattice: Goal alignment connected to performance reviews.

  • Leapsome: Goal tracking connected to employee development.

Can Teamspective replace Viva Goals?

No. Teamspective focuses on employee listening, collaboration insights, and leadership enablement rather than dedicated OKR management. It helps organizations understand team dynamics and supports managers in turning feedback into meaningful action.

What is the difference between Glint and Pulse alternatives?

The main difference is the scope of employee feedback.

Viva Glint supports organization-wide engagement surveys and reporting. For example, HR might use it to identify declining confidence in leadership across several departments.

Viva Pulse focuses on shorter, manager-led team surveys. A manager might use a pulse survey to understand why a team feels overloaded after a busy product launch.

Which alternatives work with Microsoft Teams?

Several alternatives support Microsoft Teams workflows, although the available capabilities vary.

  • Teamspective: Supports surveys and Lea, its Leadership Enablement Agent, within Microsoft Teams.

  • Peoplebox: Supports goal updates and related workflows through integrations.

  • Workleap Officevibe: Offers Teams notifications to support manager workflows.

  • SurveyMonkey: Supports survey cards and results tabs through its Teams integration.

Can I still export data from Viva Goals?

Microsoft ended access to Viva Goals on December 31, 2025. Organizations should check their previously saved exports and other retained records before planning a migration.

Conclusion

The right Microsoft Viva alternative depends on which product your organization needs to replace. Viva Glint users need employee-listening capabilities, Viva Goals users need dedicated OKR management, and Viva Pulse users need practical tools for frequent team feedback.

For organizations replacing Viva Glint, Teamspective offers a different approach to employee listening and leadership enablement. Teamspective combines employee engagement, performance, and collaboration. Lea analyzes team data and company leadership principles to help managers understand team dynamics, prepare for conversations, and take meaningful action.

Organizations replacing Viva Goals can evaluate Perdoo, Peoplebox, Lattice, and Leapsome, while Workleap Officevibe, TINYpulse, and SurveyMonkey offer different approaches to replacing Viva Pulse.

Explore Teamspective and book a demo to see how its Leadership Enablement Platform helps managers turn employee insights into better leadership practices.

Book a demo

Enable Excellent Leadership in Your Organization

Book a demo
Soc2 Compliance Logo Ccpa Compliance Logo Gdpr Compliance Logo
European AI Act Logo

Privacy and compliance by design.